I’m a consensus kind of guy, I can’t help it. I always try to find the best parts of not-so-good things (a Curate’s egg syndrome?). Let me give you an example.
One of the reasons why people like pie charts is because of its strong and familiar metaphor – it is part of our daily life.
Another good metaphor is the analog clock. You don’t need a legend to know the time. So, why don’t you use it to display hourly data?
Take a look at the radar chart on the left (the roman numerals – neat, hum?). It displays pageviews per hour by hour of the day. There are two series, daytime and nighttime. As you can see, the nighttime pageviews are much lower (I wonder why…).
If you want to compare daytime and nighttime data do everyone a favor: forget about day and night. Don’t assume that those 24 data points should be split in midnight to midday and midday to midnight. Or just because you raise early, the split should be 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. to 6 a.m. Look at the data and do what it tells you to do. A good split creates two series that maximizes variability between them (and each series becomes more internally consistent). In this case, the split was at 8:00 a.m/p.m.
Yes, but what about the Curate’s egg? Glad you asked.
Chandoo, over PointyHairedDilbert, had “an interesting charting idea to show the data around the clock“:
Jon Peltier doesn’t really like the idea and suggests a much more conservative aproach:
Now, shake both charts (shaken, not stirred…) and what do you get? My radar chart, of course! And what a fine mix of both it is!
Ok, where was I? Ah, yes, my soft boiled egg…